Showing posts with label mayoral control. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mayoral control. Show all posts

Monday, April 23, 2012

Save Bushwick Community HS--Transfer School


  1. Petitioning Deputy Chancellor Sternberg
    Created by Jesus Gonzalez

Link to Petition: http://www.change.org/petitions/deputy-chancellor-sternberg-keep-bushwick-community-high-school-open 
Why This Is Important
Dear Deputy Chancellor Sternberg,

I am writing to ask that you grant a waiver to remove 32K564, Bushwick Community High School (BCHS), from among the 33 schools slated for the turn-around model at the end of the 2011-2012 school year.

BCHS is a transfer school serving students 17-21 years-old who have had unsuccessful experiences at other high schools in the city. Most students begin at BCHS at the age of 17 or 18, with fewer than 15 credits. Therefore, it is almost impossible to graduate students before their cohort expires. BCHS should not have the standards in the metrics for graduating students at the same timeline as other schools. As a result of the current metrics with which schools are assessed (that does not take into account the unique characteristics of transfer schools) BCHS has been placed on the PLA list.

However, students at BCHS routinely demonstrate improved outcomes over their prior school experience(s). On the transfer school-specific Alternative Cohort, BCHS made AYP for Regents exam performance in the 2010/11 school year. Additionally, the school’s NYC Progress Report highlights much of its success. Compared to the other transfer schools, BCHS is given a 95% for improving student attendance, a 90% for its English Regents pass rate, and a 100% for its Math Regents pass rate. This means BCHS is performing at the top of our peer group of schools in these vital areas. These factors contribute to our grade of “B” for “Student Progress.”

Please work to stop the closing of BCHS by granting a waiver that will allow it to continue to provide such a vital service to students who have been failed by their previous schools. Thank you in advance for your efforts.

Sincerely,

Thursday, April 12, 2012

Summary Public Hearing: Implementation of Federal School Intervention Models (Turnaround) in NYC (Assembly Standing Committee on Education)

Education Committee Hearing on Implementation of Federal School Intervention Models in NYC, April 11, 2012, 10:30AM - 5:00PM. http://assembly.state.ny.us/comm/Ed/20120402/


NYSED Commissioner John B. King and NYCDOE Chancellor Dennis Walcott, Suransky and Sternberg spoke in support of Turnaround models to support rapid changes toward increasing school achievement.

The Education Committee was highly concerned about:
  1. Lack of transparent NYSED oversight of the Regents Reform Agenda, which supports the use of Race to the Top funds to implement the Turnaround model (including lack of oversight of Educational Partnership Organizations and Local Educational Agencies)
  2. NYCDOE inability to provide proof that the Turnaround model is effective way to improve schools
  3. Lack of community input regarding implementation of radical Turnaround model

  • Commissioner King spoke favorably of the NYSED Joint Investigation Teams that assess intervention needs of public schools, although the JIT does not involve parents or teachers from the school. 
  • NYC DOE cited successful turnaround school, but later Leonie Haimson stated that Suransky's school was successful because it had small class sizes.
  • Assembly Member Benedetto represented Lehman HS on multiple occasions stating Lehman did not have time to implement Restart funds.
  • AM O'Donnell consistently argued that DOE goals are admirable but DOE does not listen to communities, and that funds would better be used to lower class sizes.
  • AM Brenner suggested that Race to the Top funds only account for a minuscule percentage of the annual school budget (the fight for major changes in schools is a fight over pennies) implying that school closures/Turnaround/Restart/Transformation/Co-location along with teacher evaluation mechanisms, and push for Common Core Standards are simply part of a political fight rather than real concern over appropriate spending allocations.
  • AM Hon. Catherine Nolan (Chair of Committee on Education), angry about the Turnaround model at her school Gover Cleveland HS in Queens, was concerned mostly about lack of oversight and accountability measures. She stated on more than one occasion that she had not anticipated or intended school closures when she supported application for Race to the Top funds. She requested that NYC DOE reconsider implementation of radical Turnaround model for September, especially because it is not proven effective for improving school achievement.
  • All Assembly Members present, including AM Millman, Clark, O'Donnell, Benedetto, N Rivera, Brennan, Simanowitz, seemed concerned with unintended consequences of the Turnaround as a model for reform of public schools. The Assembly told NYSED and NYCDOE to expect FOILs for documentation of oversight and accountability measures.
  • However, Suransky, Walcott and Sternberg agreed that Turnaround is emotional but rapid transformation is necessary.
  • *NYSED and NYC DOE left after their testimonials and did not hear the testimonials of the following groups, however their representatives remained to take notes.

Testimonials:

  • Ernest Logan, Council of School Supervisors and Administrators, pointed to the blame game between the City and State, and that Turnaround is not an educationally sound model to support Persistently Low Achieving schools. He requested State Education Department oversight on local education authority, DOE and Chancellor to follow the rules.
  • Leo Casey, VP UFT, stated that Turnaround was the most disastrous policy of the Bloomberg Administration, largely because it continues to concentrate high needs students in a failure by design model, and called for 2 year moratorium on school closures.
  • Santos Crespo, Local 372 NYC Board of Education, related charter school co-location to apartheid in schools where some students are deemed better than others, and further that layoff of 642 BOE employees had a negative impact on school safety and support services. He suggested a lack of oversight in how Turnaround might increase school crime, bullying and drug use because of the shifting of teachers and BOE employees.
  • Leonie Haimson, Exec. Dir. Class Size Matters, argued that Race to the Top funds should be used to lower class sizes as a proven effective model to increase school achievement. She suggested that Community Education Councils be given weight in decisions regarding school closure / co-location.
  • Paola de Kock, NYC Citywide Council on High Schools, opposed the Turnaround model because it relies on replacement of personnel using "fundamentally arbitrary criteria" and relies on inexperienced teaching force from Teach for America. Further that DOE use of SIG funds is reckless when taking into account the unintended costs of ATRs, new teacher training and opening of new schools. She also mentioned how the Brooklyn Community School should not have been on the list of Persistently Low Achieving schools because it is a transfer school and therefore cannot be held to the 4 year cohort graduation rate, but that it is too late to do anything for that school.
  • Natasha Capers, Coalition for Educational Justice, PS/IS298 in Brownsville, stated that PS/IS298 is facing Turnaround with no clear explanation from the DOE and that using the Turnaround model in a community school is like replacing 50% of your family.
  • Elizabeth Buiss, Teacher John Dewey HS, stated that as a Restart school, Dewey had written a DOE-approved Comprehensive Education Plan to improve their school, but only given 4 months to implement the CEP when the DOE stated they would be up for Turnaround. Interestingly the Educational Impact Statement for the Turnaround proposal uses the same model that Dewey's School Leadership Team crafted for their CEP.
  • Dirk Peters, Teacher Schomburg Satellite Academy Bronx and Better Bronx Schools, stated that Race to the Top promotes opening of charter schools, which has been implemented through the school co-location model. Further that SUNY and State are not engaging in oversight of co-location of charter schools in DOE public schools.
  • Community Education Council 3 urged a cease on school closures and co-locations until all questions presented by the Assembly have been answered by NYC DOE and NYSED.
  • Students from Grover Cleveland HS, Lehman HS, Automotive HS, Sheepshead Bay HS, Legacy HS, El Puente, and others presented their lack of faith in the NYC DOE Turnaround model to increase school achievement, especially because it would remove 50% of their teachers.

Summary by Better Bronx Schools

Afterthought:
The Education Committee did not take to the idea that using Race to the Top funding to promote co-location of charter schools was inherently connected to the Turnaround model. 

This implies that folks do not see a connection between co-location and future label as Persistently Low Achieving status followed by Turnaround implementation. 

Schomburg Satellite, although only facing co-location with a charter school in September 2012, may in the near future be slated to the same fate as Brooklyn Community School. Please lookout for negative reports about Schomburg Satellite.

Monday, March 19, 2012

Satellite Fights DOE Move to Increase Floor Capacity

This story is about how the DOE allegedly increased the building capacity (number of seats) from 295 seats to 432 seats in one year (with no new construction or change of rooms).




The DOE responded by saying that the Bronx Regional Building is at 67% capacity--BUT we are calling for an INVESTIGATION of this capacity rate. 

Here's why:
  • In 2009 the 5th floor capacity was 295 seats.
  • In 2010 the 5th floor capacity was changed by the DOE to 432 seats.
  • This is a 46% increase in capacity.

What accounts for this change?

Interestingly, ROADS II charter school application was presented to SUNY around the same time in 2010. The ROADS school application was initially sent by Cami Anderson, who worked in the SAME BRONX REGIONAL BUILDING (the proposal was sent back to the drawing board 2 times because of Conflict of Interest).

Further, the DOE co-location proposal requires that the 5th floor give the new charter school 46% of the 5th floor.....exactly the same amount of increase that occurred in 2010 when ROADS II application was filed.

You do the math.




(03/19/12) THE BRONX - The Schomburg Satellite School is fighting a Department of Education (DOE) plan to put a second school in the building floor it already occupies.

The DOE wants to put the second school on the fourth and fifth floors, adding 250 students to the building.

Schomburg officials say that the plan would put the floors at 121-percent capacity and the DOE isn't planning of adding additional classrooms or teachers.

The DOE is expected to vote on the issue Wednesday.




Sunday, March 18, 2012

Los Sures fights against Success Academy Charter School


Video Found at Grassroots Education Movement Youtube Page: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ph7lCgWfzTY&feature=plcp&context=C44839b2VDvjVQa1PpcFPLy_raIaP8G0Ah9pjHIxCz9v_TFr3jKbI%3D

Saturday, March 10, 2012

JOINT PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 12

SATA-WHAT? 
SATELLITE Joint Public Hearing

When: March 12 at 6:00pm (come early to sign up at 5:30)
Where: Bronx Regional Building, 1010 Rev. James Polite Ave, Bronx, NY 10459

(Photo Credit: Patrick Wall, DNAinfo.com)

  • What: Share your comments about the proposal to add a fourth school to the Bronx Regional Building.
  • How: prepare a comment, letter or 2 minute statement to read or submit to the Department of Education (we will have a presentation and information if you are unsure of what you want to say)
  • Bring: parents, guardians, grandparents, aunties and uncles, students, siblings, neighbors, friends, pastors, counselors, and anyone who is interested in the future of Satellite Academy, Bronx Regional and the state of their community schools
How will co-location impact your school? 
How has our community been involved in this discussion?
What do you want the Department of Education to hear? 

Speak out on March 12 @6pm!

Get your voice heard! 
(Photo Credit: Patrick Wall, DNAinfo.com)

Photos from:

Bronx Students Walk Out of Class to Protest Charter Co-Location Plan  

Read more: http://www.dnainfo.com/20120309/south-bronx/bronx-students-walk-out-of-class-protest-charter-co-location-plan#ixzz1om9zz289

Friday, March 9, 2012

Bronx Students Walk Out of Class to Protest Charter Co-Location Plan

By Patrick Wall DNAinfo Reporter/Producer
March 9, 2012 6:49pm
  
LONGWOOD — When several dozen students at Schomburg Satellite Academy High School heard the 12:05 bell ring Friday afternoon, rather than meander to their next class, they stood up, pulled out neon-colored poster boards and marched outside.

 

Cheyenne Lee, 18, addresses students from Schomburg Satellite Academy High School during a protest on March 9, 2012. Aiesha Vegas, 17, holds a sign. (DNAinfo/Patrick Wall)

 
Some 60 students joined in the walkout to protest the Department of Education's plan to move a new charter school into the five-story building at 1010 Reverend James Polite Ave., which already houses Schomburg and Bronx Regional High School, as well as a full-time GED program and childcare, medical and student-referral centers.

The protest comes days before a public hearing Monday on the proposal, and following weeks of organizing, outreach and even talk of legal action on the part of Schomburg students, who worry the city’s plan will lead to overcrowding, strained resources and even conflicts between the building’s current occupants and newcomers.

Students from Schomburg Satellite Academy High School staged a walkout on March 9, 2012 to protest the city's plan to move a new charter school into their building. (DNAinfo/Patrick Wall)

“You’re invading our space and the family we have here,” said student Crystal Samuels, 18, whose mother, Nona Samuels, is president of the school’s Parent Teacher Association.

Crystal added, “You bring in more kids — that’s more altercations.”

Like other students at the protest, Samuels emphasized that she was not opposed to the planned charter school, called ROADS II, but rather to the Department of Education’s plan to place ROADS in a building with two other schools.

The students proceeded down Polite Avenue to the district office of State Senator Ruben Diaz Sr., where they chanted “No new schools!” as about a dozen police and school safety officers looked on.

The senator briefly stepped outside and offered the students his support, then he and a staffer met with four student representatives in his office.

Rev. Diaz told the students he supports charter schools, but not when the DOE uses them to “pit communities against each other.” He advised the students to recruit as many supporters as possible to attend Monday’s hearing.

“You have to get that place packed,” Diaz told the students, adding, “You’re doing the right thing.”

Resistance to the so-called co-location plan has slowly gained momentum since the DOE announced the proposal on its website about a month ago.

Students, parents and staff from Schomburg, along with a few representatives from Bronx Regional, held their first serious meeting about the plan on February 21. Since then, Schomburg’s student council has taken up the cause, the Parent Teacher Association discussed the matter, and a public interest law firm was reached to explore possible legal action against the city.

Both Schomburg and Bronx Regional serve older students who transferred from other high schools, often because they struggled with academics or discipline. ROADS II would also admit older students who are behind in credits, but they plan to give preference to teens who have faced serious setbacks, such as homelessness or run-ins with the law.

At Friday’s rally, students said classroom space is already limited. For example, Schomburg students currently have access to a single computer lab and must share a cafeteria and gym with Bronx Regional.

While both schools now occupy their own floors, students said it seems inevitable that next year they will have to split floor space with the charter school.

“We’re going to be overcrowded and uncomfortable,” said Schomburg student Eygribelk Ramirez, 15.

He and other students said they fear the co-location will lead to fights and fewer resources for students.

According to the DOE, only 67 percent of available space in the 162,000 square-foot building is being utilized. Adding another school to the building will not harm the current occupants, the DOE noted.

But Schomburg students and staff disagree. They have pointed out that Schomburg would eventually lose about half of its instructional space, going from 20 classrooms this year to a proposed 10-and-a-half classrooms in 2014, as ROADS moves in.

ROADS II is scheduled to open in the Bronx this fall with 150 students, while another branch, ROADS I, will launch in Brooklyn.

The schools, whose charter application was approved by the state last year, boasts a high-powered board of trustees that includes Jeff Li, the executive director of Teach For America in New York, and chairman Mark Gallogly, co-founder of the private equity firm Centerbridge Partners, as well as a member of President Obama’s Economic Recovery Advisory Board.

The DOE will hold a public hearing on its proposal at 6 p.m. Monday at the school building on Polite Avenue

An educational oversight panel, which traditionally approves the DOE’s proposals, will vote on the plan the following week.

Regarding Friday’s walkout, a DOE spokeswoman said: “Students have a right to express themselves, but they cannot walk out during school hours and disrupt classroom time.”

Representatives for ROADS did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the protest.

Monday, February 20, 2012

Mayor Bloomberg's School leadership slammed as a Failure by New York's Elected Officials!




Video by Darren Marelli

Grassroots Education Movement writes:

"On February 9th at Brooklyn Tech High School, more than 2,000 parents, students and teachers voted "No Confidence" in the Panel for Educational Policy (PEP), a rubber-stamp for Michael Bloomberg's undemocratic system of mayoral control over New York City's public schools.

"In complete indifference to the will of parents, students, teachers, and the borough appointees on the panel, the mayor's puppets have voted to close 117 schools. These closures are devastating to local communities and a testament to the utter failure of a decade of mayoral dictatorship over the public school system." see: http://www.gemnyc.org

see also:
Coalition for Public Education http://www.forpubliced.blogspot.com/
NYC Public School Parents http://nycpublicschoolparents.blogspot.com/